Science and Evolution are Best at LYING -- to self, and especially, to others?

What did Darwin really say about the "eye"? For, here is one of the main sticking points evolutionists have had to face from "creationists" almost since day one. That is... Because of the complexity of the eye it had to be designed, and could not happen by chance, and evolution cannot explain it. Or, so say the critics of evolution. And, they say, even Darwin admitted this in his book on evolution. Here's what they quote from Darwin himself:

To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. Chapter 6 from Origin of Species.

Well, that didn't sit too well for the evolution crowd. Why, here was their hero admitting the eye proved him wrong. How dare they use Darwin against Darwin. So, evolutionists decided, for the first time, they should read their own book of religion, the Origin of Species. And, lo and behold, they found the answer. Why those "creationists" they deliberately left out the next part of that quotation. And, that part proves that Darwin said no such thing, at least not as interpreted by the "creationists". Look at this!! they yelled! This is the rest of the quote, read it!!

Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself first originated; but I may remark that several facts make me suspect that any sensitive nerve may be rendered sensitive to light, and likewise to those coarser vibrations of the air which produce sound. Chapter 6 from Origin of Species.

So, who is right here? The answer is the evolutionists and science have lied to themselves, and others. We can tell this just by the above two quotes, much less from reading the rest of Darwin's Chapter 6. This does not, though, excuse the "creationists" for their errors, and for only quoting part of what Darwin said. Let's look now, and see how the "liars" have believed their own distortion and lies about the world we see around us.

Science, and evolution, along with many other professions, have adopted a language all their own. It is a language that looks like the ordinary language of the street. But, it isn't. It is a language of deception. As a sidelight, take your unabridged dictionary and find words familiar to you, and then take a legal dictionary and look up the same words. If you look long enough, you will see how you can be morally right, and honest, but in court can be turned almost immediately into a criminal by the same words you use, which mean something different to the court. It's downright amazing. And, this applies to the language of science so-called, according to an ancient writer. First, then, let's look at how the full quote above by Darwin does not say what evolutionists want him to say. For, once even they begin to see how their language works, [many have accepted this without challenge, but should challenge what they have been taught, IF they believe they are real scientists.] they will have to admit there is something dramatically wrong with their religion of evolution. Ok, Darwin, you're up...

"...I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."

Then he goes on with:

"Yet REASON tells me [is reason able to talk? is it a sentient being?]
that IF [if means he doesn't have proof of such, but IF he had it...] numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor,
CAN BE SHOWN [admission that it hasn't been shown, but "IF gradations CAN BE SHOWN"] to exist;
IF FURTHER [again, IF shows he is guessing],
the eye does vary ever so slightly, [well, does it or doesn't it? IF he knows, then he should say so.]
and the variations BE INHERITED, [i.e. he has no proof yet of such inheritance, he is still guessing, for the IF also applies to BE INHERITED],
which is CERTAINLY THE CASE [how can that be since he just said IF, IF FURTHER, can be shown, all non factual statements,];
and IF [another IF? where's the proof?]
any variation or modification in the organ BE EVER USEFUL [well, what if it isn't, to use their term?] under
CHANGING CONDITIONS [here he is forcing this qualification to make it seem as fact. Yet it is still an IF .... CHANGING CONDITIONS -- pure speculation] of life,
THEN the DIFFICULTY of BELIEVING [a belief is not real, just ask any evolutionist when someone has a belief in the Bible or a Creator, but here Darwin says under these IF's it is not difficult to BELIEVE his speculation.] that a perfect and complex eye
COULD BE formed ["could be formed" is no more proof than might have been formed.] by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination,
can hardly be considered real. [Why not? So far Mr. Darwin has only speculated about what IF, COULD BE and maybe.]
How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us [because you can't answer those kinds of questions] more than how life itself first originated;
But I may remark that several facts make me SUSPECT [he doesn't have the facts he mentions or he would not have to "suspect" he would KNOW] that any sensitive nerve
MAY [MAY is not WILL] be rendered sensitive to light, and likewise to those coarser vibrations of the air which produce SOUND. [?]

The above is an example of delusion using language. Evolutionists and scientists want you to read the above as FACT. Yet, it is pure supposition and speculation on the fly. And, if you look at the words of the language of deception, most of which I have placed in caps, they are escape valves. What do I mean by that? It's simple. They want YOU to read their works as fact, but they leave loopholes in the language so they can escape when you pin them down. Like this:

Ordinary person: Excuse me, sir. You said the eye was formed because of stimulation to a nerve by light. And, that because of that a perfect and complex eye was formed. However, since science talks about things that can be replicated in the laboratory, why are we not forming eyes today using these same principles. Just think of what that would do for the blind. And, certainly with all science can do we don't need millions or billions of years to form the eye. On the other hand, if the eye was necessary for survival, how did all the creatures survive that long without eyes until their offspring had eyes to escape the predators? And, if they could survive the millions of years necessary, why was the eye needed anyway? Many creatures survive quite well without eyes.

Evolutionist/Scientist: Now, look, I did not say that. I only said, IF those conditions existed, and IF they be inherited, then the eye could have formed. I didn't say it did form that way.

We don't have to read the rest of Chapter 6 of Darwin's religious book, i.e. the evolutionists Bible, to see how much more of a myth and religion it is than any other belief system called religion. For if we pointed out throughout the whole book the language of deception he uses and is still being used today by his disciples, then they would have a hard time explaining why they use this language to deceive themselves and others. However, I suggest you now read the whole chapter yourself. Then, pick up a magazine on science that writes these "indepth" articles about evolutionary science and you will be astounded at what they say as fact that is pure speculation and religious belief. But, my friends, to them, IF, MAYBE, POSSIBLY, IT SEEMS AS IF, IT APPEARS to be, etc. etc. means facts to them. They are incapable of seeing that this is the language of foolish men and women who are living a lie. Who woulda thunk it?

You can read all of Chapter 6 by clicking HERE.

Now, where's my labcoat, rubber gloves, and specimen bottle? I need my priestly outfit to practice my religion.